Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: Steve Devore Date: Mar 28, 2011 8:01am
Forum: forums Subject: Re: NO FAKES OF BOOKS IN THE ARCHIVE , PLEASE!

Hmm.. The file claims to only require version 1.5 or higher, but it looks ok in my version of Adobe Acrobat (version 1.9).

When I look at it I do see the left column as well, but it is more gray instead of black. Evidently the process google uses tries to save text as black & white, while leaving the areas it thinks are pictures pictures as shades of gray. You are having problems seeing the areas that are saved as pictures (though sometimes, like this case they are actually part of the text).

It does appear that there's problems with everything but the pdf file though. The PDF is the source document (which came from google). Hopefully this is something the archive folks are taking a look at. I expect that when the find the problem they will reprocess the files that have this problem.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cuneiform Date: Mar 28, 2011 9:04am
Forum: forums Subject: Re: NO FAKES OF BOOKS IN THE ARCHIVE , PLEASE!

All the 3 mentioned files came from google. Is it possible to signalize the damaged files? Perhaps, google is not aware of this problem.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cuneiform Date: Mar 28, 2011 8:42am
Forum: forums Subject: Re: NO FAKES OF BOOKS IN THE ARCHIVE , PLEASE!

Formerly, I downloaded files thinking they all were OK. Now, I have to look them through in order to exclude such damaged pages. If there are parallel copies one can re-download them from another source. However, it's not always the case that there are parallel copies available.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Administrator, Curator, or StaffJeff Kaplan Date: Mar 28, 2011 9:21am
Forum: forums Subject: Re: NO FAKES OF BOOKS IN THE ARCHIVE , PLEASE!

we appreciate the feedback. i'll try to get an answer to the issue.

fwiw, those items were uploaded by a user, not scanned by internet archive. our policy is to not alter users items except at their request.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: micah6vs8 Date: Mar 28, 2011 8:50am
Forum: forums Subject: Re: NO FAKES OF BOOKS IN THE ARCHIVE , PLEASE!

I hear you are angry, but maybe the energy should be brought to bear in fixing the problem? If it's clear there is a problem, which there very well might be.
When you eat for free at another person's table, you can't complain about the food too much, unless you want to try and help the cook (and even then go easy).
And Cap Lock is never your friend.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cuneiform Date: Mar 28, 2011 9:41am
Forum: forums Subject: Re: NO FAKES OF BOOKS IN THE ARCHIVE , PLEASE!

Apropos of CapsLock: You are right, it's been a fault of mine, I haven't noticed switching to the 'State Department Style', sorry. (They are writing all the documents in this style throughout, anyway!). Never will do such a thing anymore.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cuneiform Date: Mar 28, 2011 9:08am
Forum: forums Subject: NO FAKES OF BOOKS IN THE ARCHIVE , PLEASE!

You are taking me a way off the topic. If you have to complain at one's table, different scenarios are possible even if the table is served as being free. You may go away without complaining though thanking. Inside you'll be worrying, anyway. Or you may be alarming. As at my best friend's. Hoping he'll do his best while expecting my complaints. That's my case. I like this site very much indeed.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cuneiform Date: Mar 28, 2011 8:29am
Forum: forums Subject: Re: NO FAKES OF BOOKS IN THE ARCHIVE , PLEASE!

I have downloaded lots of fine files from this site, feel rather thankful than protesting, only few are damaged. So I tried to report damages and was trying to contact the scanning person. However, the intendant's reply was scanning is a matter of volunteers, so no contacts wanted. I can't guess why.